DSpace Repository

Incidence of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy after Radical Hysterectomy and Preoperative Prognostic Factors in Cervical Cancer Patients (Stage IA2-IIA1) in Lampang Hospital, Ten Years’ Experience

Show simple item record

dc.contributor.author Kuanoon Buapaichit en_US
dc.contributor.author Salisa Choyrum en_US
dc.contributor.author Nattaya Sowala en_US
dc.contributor.author Poranee Makee en_US
dc.contributor.author Nattida Sing-on en_US
dc.date.accessioned 2025-07-25T04:27:35Z
dc.date.available 2025-07-25T04:27:35Z
dc.date.issued 2025-07-25
dc.identifier.citation GMS Medicine Journal. Vol.5, No.3 (September - December 2025) : p.121-129 en_US
dc.identifier.issn 2730-3446
dc.identifier.uri http://mfuir.mfu.ac.th:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/989
dc.description บทความ (Article) en_US
dc.description.abstract Introduction: For early-stage cervical cancer (IA2–IIA1), radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy and primary chemoradiation offer comparable cure rates. However, some patients require adjuvant radiation therapy after surgery. Combined modality therapy can lead to significant long-term complications. Objectives: The objective of this study is to evaluate the incidence of adjuvant radiation therapy after radical hysterectomy and to identify preoperative prognostic factors in early-stage cervical cancer (stages IA2–IIA1) at Lampang Hospital. Materials and Method: This retrospective cohort study included early-stage cervical cancer patients who underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy (2014–2023). Preoperative risk factors for adjuvant radiotherapy, including tumor size, diagnostic method, tumor type, vaginal bleeding, and suspected vaginal invasion, were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression in Stata 18.0. Results: Out of 173 patients, 69 (39.9%) received postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy. Preoperative vaginal bleeding (aOR 2.48, 95% CI: 1.21-5.06; p = 0.013) and suspected vaginal invasion (aOR 10.92, 95% CI: 1.23-97.09; p = 0.032) were significantly associated with the need for adjuvant radiation therapy after radical hysterectomy. Tumor size > 4 cm was associated with an increased risk in the univariable analysis (OR 2.76, p = 0.016). Other factors, including non-SCCA histology and gross lesions, showed trends toward increased risk but did not reach statistical significance. Conclusion: At Lampang Hospital, 39.9% of patients received postoperative radiation therapy after radical hysterectomy. Preoperative clinical examinations alone are insufficient to predict radiation therapy needs. Advanced imaging techniques, such as CT or MRI, are used to aid in treatment planning. In resource-limited settings, evaluations should focus on high-risk patients with vaginal bleeding, suspected vaginal invasion, or tumors > 4 cm. en_US
dc.language.iso en en_US
dc.publisher School of Medicine, Mae Fah Luang University en_US
dc.subject Uterine Cervical Neoplasms en_US
dc.subject Radical Hysterectomy en_US
dc.subject Radiotherapy en_US
dc.subject Adjuvant en_US
dc.title Incidence of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy after Radical Hysterectomy and Preoperative Prognostic Factors in Cervical Cancer Patients (Stage IA2-IIA1) in Lampang Hospital, Ten Years’ Experience en_US
dc.title.alternative Incidence of Adjuvant Radiation Therapy after Radical Hysterectomy and Preoperative Prognostic Factors in Cervical Cancer Patients (Stage IA2-IIA1) in Lampang Hospital, Ten Year is Experience en_US
dc.type Article en_US


Files in this item

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record

Search DSpace


Advanced Search

Browse

My Account