Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://mfuir.mfu.ac.th:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/1504Full metadata record
| DC Field | Value | Language |
|---|---|---|
| dc.contributor.author | Oche Joseph Otorkpa | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Chinenye Oche Otorkpa | en_US |
| dc.contributor.author | Faith Obuye | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2026-01-27T04:00:10Z | - |
| dc.date.available | 2026-01-27T04:00:10Z | - |
| dc.date.issued | 2026-01-27 | - |
| dc.identifier.issn | 2673-0294 | - |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://mfuir.mfu.ac.th:80/xmlui/handle/123456789/1504 | - |
| dc.description | บทความ (Article) | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | Introduction: The integration of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) into mainstream healthcare systems has been growing, reflecting a shift towards more holistic and patient-centered care. This study explores the integration of CAM into mainstream healthcare by analyzing case reports. The aim was to elucidate the trends in CAM utilization, identify associated challenges, and explore potential opportunities for enhancing patient outcomes and healthcare delivery. Methods: A comprehensive literature search was performed across multiple electronic databases, including PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar. The search covered case reports published between January 2004 and April 2024, using both Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) terms and free-text searches. The quality of the case reports was assessed using criteria adapted from the CARE guidelines, which emphasized the clarity of reporting, the appropriateness of study design, documentation of clinical outcomes, and potential biases. Results: The review identified a wide variety of CAM modalities used within mainstream healthcare, such as acupuncture, herbal medicine, chiropractic care, and mind-body practices. These modalities demonstrated efficacy in managing a range of health conditions and often complemented conventional treatments, enhancing patient outcomes. However, the review also highlighted several challenges, including adverse events linked to certain CAM interventions and disparities in access to CAM services among different patient populations. Conclusion: CAM integration enhances patient-centered care but presents challenges like adverse events and unequal access. Research, education, interdisciplinary collaboration, and evidence-based practice are vital for safe, ethical integration, improving patient care. | en_US |
| dc.language.iso | en | en_US |
| dc.publisher | School of Health Science, Mae Fah Luang University | en_US |
| dc.subject | Complementary therapies | en_US |
| dc.subject | Alternative medicine | en_US |
| dc.subject | Evidence-Based Practice | en_US |
| dc.subject | Patient-Centered Care | en_US |
| dc.subject | Alternative medicine use | en_US |
| dc.subject | Integrative medicine | en_US |
| dc.title | Growing Use of Complementary and Alternative Medicine (CAM) in Mainstream Healthcare: A Review of Case Reports | en_US |
| dc.type | Article | en_US |
| Appears in Collections: | บทความ (Article) | |
Files in This Item:
| File | Description | Size | Format | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-v07-no03-p.41-49.pdf | บทความ (Article) | 500 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.